1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 28 Wis.2d
  5. 28 Wis.2d 376 (1965)
 

MASSEY v. STATE

28 Wis.2d 376 (1965)

MASSEY, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 5, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Charlton, Yanisch, Binzak & Ritchay of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Earl A. Charlton.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Robert E. Sutton, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Hugh R. O'Connell, district attorney.

CURRIE, C. J.

Defendant seeks reversal of the judgment of conviction on these two grounds:

(1) The appointment of the same counsel to represent both defendant and Sullivan because of claimed conflict of interests.

(2) The alleged illegal search of the automobile and seizure of the modified rifle.

Appointment of Same Counsel.

In support of the contention that it was prejudicial error for the trial court to have appointed Attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases