1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 23 A.D.2d
  5. 23 A.D.2d 378 (1965)
 

HABENICHT v. R. K. O. THEATRES

23 A.D.2d 378 (1965)

Frederick Habenicht, Appellant, v. R. K. O. Theatres, Inc., Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 29, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman Roy Grutman of counsel (Ciceil L. Gross with him on the brief), for appellant.

Joseph J. Brophy of counsel (Hanlon & Dawe, attorneys), for respondent.

BOTEIN, P. J., BREITEL, RABIN, VALENTE and STALEY, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

It is unfortunate that we again are obliged to repeat what we have so often stated — that all litigants, regardless of the merits of their case, are entitled to a fair trial (Salzano v. City of New York, 22 A.D.2d 656). A deprivation of a fair trial calls for a reversal of the decision or verdict rendered. The conduct of the Trial Judge in this case was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases