WILF, v. PHILA. MODELING & C. SCH., INC.


205 Pa.Super. 196 (1965)

Wilf, Appellant, v. Philadelphia Modeling and Charm School, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

March 18, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Goldberg, with him Maxwell E. Verlin, and Verlin & Goldberg, for appellant.

Jerome B. Apfel, with him Blank, Rudenko, Klaus & Rome, for appellee.

Frederick W. Anton, III, with him Paul H. Ferguson, for appellee.

Before ERVIN, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, and FLOOD, JJ. (RHODES, P.J., absent).


OPINION BY MONTGOMERY, J., March 18, 1965:

This appeal is from the refusal of plaintiff-appellant's motions for judgment non obstante veredicto and for a new trial after a jury verdict for both defendants-appellees in an action of trespass for property damage.

The only evidence in this case was presented by the appellant. Appellees did not present any evidence. Considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the appellees and giving them the benefit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases