GREAT WESTERN PACKERS EXPRESS, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants,
Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., Watson-Wilson Transportation System, Inc., Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc., Little Audrey's Transportation Co., Inc., and Midwest Coast Transport, Inc., Intervenors.
United States District Court D. Colorado.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 15, 1965.
September 15, 1965.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Singer & Hardman, Chicago, Ill., and Holme, Roberts, More & Owen and Richard L. Schrepferman, Denver, Colo., for plaintiff.
Donald F. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John H. D. Wigger, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., and Lawrence M. Henry, U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for defendant United States of America.
Robert W. Ginnane, Gen. Counsel, and Clarence William Vandergrift, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D. C., for defendant Interstate Commerce Commission.
Jones, Meiklejohn, Kehl & Lyons and Alvin J. Meiklejohn, Jr., Denver, Colo., for intervenor Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc.
LeGrand A. Carlston and Z. L. Pearson, Jr., Denver, Colo., for intervenor Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc.
David Axelrod and Edward G. Bazelon, Chicago, Ill., and Z. L. Pearson, Jr., and LeGrand A. Carlston, Denver, Colo., for intervenors Watson-Wilson Transportation System, Inc., Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc., and Little Audrey's Transportation Co., Inc.
Donald L. Stern, Omaha, Neb., and Alvin J. Meiklejohn, Jr., Denver, Colo., for intervenor Midwest Coast Transport, Inc.
Before BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge, and ARRAJ and CHILSON, District Judges.
United States District Court D. Colorado.
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought to enjoin and set aside the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission entered in Investigation and Suspension Docket No. M-19660, Fresh Meats and PHP via Thunderbird Freight Lines, Inc. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1336 and hearing by a three-judge district court is required by 28 U.S.C. § 2325. The defendants and the intervenors have moved to dissolve the temporary restraining order heretofore...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
