Per Curiam.
A majority of the court is of the opinion that reasonable minds could differ on the issue as to whether the insured's answers in his application were willfully false and fraudulently made. Therefore, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
ZIMMERMAN, O'NEILL, HERBERT and SCHNEIDER, JJ., concur.
TAFT, C. J., and MATTHIAS, J., dissent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.