BROOKS v. TAYLOR

No. H-43.

181 So.2d 190 (1965)

James E. BROOKS and Katherine H. Brooks, Appellants, v. James L. TAYLOR and Eunice P. Taylor, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

December 14, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weinstein, Weinberg & Weinstein, St. Augustine, for appellants.

Ernest R. Drosdick, of Anderson, Rush, Dean & Lowndes, Orlando, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

Appellees have moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the brief filed by appellants fails to comply with the rules of civil procedure.

Rule 3.7, subd. f(4), 31 F.S.A., requires that the specific assignments of error from which the points argued arise should be stated immediately following the statement of the points involved as set forth in the argument section of the brief. By their brief appellants fail to relate any assignment of error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases