BEATTY v. CAKE


242 Or. 128 (1965)

407 P.2d 619

BEATTY v. CAKE ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed November 3, 1965.

Petition for rehearing denied December 7, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Love, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were John R. Faust, Jr., and Cake, Jaureguy, Hardy, Buttler & McEwen, Portland.

David P. Templeton, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Verne Dusenbery and Dusenbery, Martin, Beatty & Parks, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, GOODWIN, HOLMAN, LUSK and SCHWAB, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

SLOAN, J.

When this case was here before (Beatty v. Cake, 1964, 236 Or. 498, 387 P.2d 355, 390 P.2d 176) we held that there should be an apportionment of the amount of the federal estate taxes between these parties. The case was returned to the trial court to make the apportionment. Defendants appeal from the apportionment made by the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases