1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 350 F.2d
  5. 350 F.2d 18 (1965)
 

CANADIAN INGERSOLL-RAND CO. v. PETERSON PRODUCTS

No. 19266.

350 F.2d 18 (1965)

CANADIAN INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, Ltd., Rand Development Corporation and Ingersoll-Rand World Trade Limited, Appellants, v. PETERSON PRODUCTS OF SAN MATEO, INC., a corporation also known as Peterson Spray Gun Co., Inc., a corporation, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied August 10, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Blake Townsend, Robert E. Kosinski, Carroll G. Harper, Byerly, Townsend, Watson & Churchill, New York City, for appellants.

Charles E. Townsend, Anthony B. Diepenbrock, Stephen S. Townsend, Townsend & Townsend, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MADDEN, Judge of the Court of Claims, and HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

In this patent infringement suit the district court entered judgment for defendant, determining that the two patents sued upon are invalid and, in any event, not infringed. The opinion of the district court leading to entry of this judgment is reported in 223 F.Supp. 803.

Plaintiffs appealed from that judgment. They thereafter moved in the district court, under Rule 60(b), Federal Rules of Civil...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases