KNOX v. HANSON


242 Or. 114 (1965)

408 P.2d 76

KNOX ET UX v. HANSON ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed and remanded November 24, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Larkin, Redmond, and Roy Kilpatrick, Canyon City, argued the cause for appellants. With them on the briefs were Brewster, Copenhaver & Larkin and Ronald L. Bryant, Redmond.

Gordon Wilson, John Day, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and SLOAN, GOODWIN, DENECKE, LUSK and SCHWAB, Justices.


REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SCHWAB, J. (Pro Tempore)

The plaintiffs, Horace and Barbara Knox, appeal from a decree interpreting share crop agreements they had entered into with defendants, H.M. and Fred Hanson. The principal parties are the plaintiff, Horace Knox, and the defendant, H.M. Hanson, and we hereafter refer to the parties in the singular.

Defendant Hanson owned a sheep ranch near Mitchell, Oregon, apparently worth in excess of $150,000. By virtue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases