FINK v. REITZ


28 Wis.2d 319 (1965)

FINK and another, Appellants, v. REITZ and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 5, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by John T. Pryor and Charles Saggio, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Saggio.

For the respondents there was a brief by Wickham, Borgelt, Skogstad & Powell, attorneys, and Edmund W. Powell of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Edmund W. Powell.


FAIRCHILD, J.

Plaintiffs assert there are six issues, which we discuss as follows:

1. New trial in the interest of justice. There were two versions of the collision. The gist of Mrs. Fink's testimony is that she made a right turn from the westernmost lane of traffic; that she had traveled in that lane for some distance; that as she approached Abbott street she gradually slowed down, activated her directional signal for a right turn, flashed her brake...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases