VICK v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 30039.

239 Cal.App.2d 105 (1965)

47 Cal. Rptr. 840

GRACE VICK, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; HUGH L. VICK, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

December 29, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Brock, Edwin S. Saul and Brock & Saul for Petitioner.

Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel and William F. Stewart, Deputy County Counsel for Respondent.

Steven Edmondson for Real Party in Interest.


FRAMPTON, J. pro tem.*

Prohibition to restrain the respondent court from proceeding to hear and determine an order to show cause why the provisions of an interlocutory decree of divorce relating to child support should not be modified.

An examination of the file in the action below and the petition discloses that petitioner, Grace Vick, was the plaintiff in an action for divorce filed by her on January 15, 1952,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases