ADAMS v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

Civ. A. Nos. 5385, 5428-5434, 5491, 5510, 5511, 5522, 5530, 5531 and 5553.

254 F.Supp. 78 (1965)

Georgia Ann ADAMS v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. Morgan H. CARTER et ux. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. C. H. HUGHES et ux. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. Jack THOMPSON et ux. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. John W. WILLIAMS v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. William E. BROWN et ux. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. Martha HUGHES v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. Bill C. BOWERS et ux. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. Charles F. CHANDLER v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. Rufus D. HUGHES et ux. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. Clarence E. MILLER et ux. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. Robert H. BERRY et ux. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. Lawrence W. MILLER et ux. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. Robert Bruce BIRDWHISTLE et ux. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. W. C. WARD et ux. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY.

United States District Court E. D. Tennessee, N. D.

Order April 26, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Floyd H. Bowers, Clinton, Tenn., for Georgia Ann Adams.

James H. Jarvis, O'Neil, Jarvis, Parker & Williamson, Jenkins & Jenkins, Knoxville, Tenn., for Morgan H. Carter, et ux.

James H. Jarvis, Jenkins & Jenkins, Knoxville, Tenn., for C. H. Hughes, et ux., John W. Williams, William E. Brown, et ux., Martha Hughes, Bill C. Bowers, et ux.

William R. Hurst, Knoxville, Tenn., for Charles F. Chandler.

James H. Jarvis, Ray L. Jenkins, Knoxville Tenn., for Rufus D. Hughes, et ux., Clarence E. Miller, et ux., W. C. Ward, et ux.

James H. Jarvis, Knoxville, Tenn., for Lawrence W. Miller, et ux., Robert Bruce Birdwhistle, et ux.

Norbert J. Slovis, Lockett, Slovis & Weaver, Ray L. Jenkins, Knoxville, Tenn., for Robert H. Berry, et ux.

Charles J. McCarthy, Thomas A. Pedersen, Jacob D. Vreeland, Beauchamp E. Brogan, Paul T. Dunn, Division of Law, Knoxville, Tenn., for T. V. A.


ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Chief Judge.

This action was started August 4, 1965 against the TVA in the Circuit Court of Anderson County, alleging that blasting in the early months of 1963 by the Authority in connection with the construction of its Bull Run Steam Plant had done great and permanent damage to plaintiff's dwelling house on nearby property.

On August 19, 1965 the Authority petitioned for removal of the cause to this Court, under 16 U.S.C. §§ 831...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases