The People of the State of New York, Appellant,
v.
Irving Kahan, Respondent.
The People of the State of New York, Appellant,
v.
Isadore Gottlieb, Respondent.
The People of the State of New York, Appellant,
v.
David Appelbaum and Abraham Fleesler, Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued January 12, 1965.
Decided March 18, 1965.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney (Harry Brodbar and Raymond J. Scanlan of counsel), for appellant in the first two above-entitled actions.
Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney (Michael Juviler and H. Richard Uviller of counsel), for appellant in the third above-entitled action.
Osmond K. Fraenkel for respondents.
Judges DYE, VAN VOORHIS and BERGAN concur in Per Curiam opinion, Judge FULD concurring in a separate opinion; Judge BURKE dissents in an opinion in which Chief Judge DESMOND and Judge SCILEPPI concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Per Curiam.
The decision in People v. Bookcase, Inc. (14 N.Y.2d 409) implied that a constitutionally valid statute defining obscenity in its impact on the young, as distinguished from obscenity in respect of adults, might emerge under careful draftsmanship. We find defects in draftsmanship of section 484-h of the Penal Law which seem to be remediable both in respect of its...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
