The defendant seasonably objected to the absence from the plaintiff's affidavit in support of its motion for summary judgment, sworn to in the State of Illinois, of the authenticating certificate prescribed by CPLR 2309 (subd. [c]). Though the defect could have been cured by amendment, it was not so cured; the affidavit was, therefore, not properly before the court (Majestic Co. v. Wender,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MERCANTILE NAT. BANK v. WISMER
48 Misc.2d 275 (1965)
Mercantile National Bank of Chicago, Respondent, v. Harry Wismer, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 16, 1965
September 16, 1965
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Rembar & Zolotar (
Concur — TILZER, J. P., HECHT and HOFSTADTER, JJ.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
