SHIELDS v. KUDRNA


242 Or. 74 (1965)

408 P.2d 210

SHIELDS ET AL v. KUDRNA

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed November 24, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glenn D. Ramirez, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Robert H. Goodwin, Klamath Falls.

William M. Collver, Coos Bay, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were McInturff, Thom & Collver, Coos Bay.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

McALLISTER, C.J.

This is a declaratory judgment proceeding in which plaintiffs appeal from a decree declaring that they, as the lineal descendants of Sadie L. Cassady, are not entitled to take under the will of W.L. Cassady.

Sadie L. Cassady and W.L. Cassady were married in about 1933. No children were born as the issue of their marriage. Sadie had been married before, and the plaintiffs are her lineal descendants by her prior marriage. W...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases