1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 88 N.J.
  5. 88 N.J. Super. 215 (1965)
 

LAMENA v. CAMDEN LOCAL NO. 396, ETC.

88 N.J. Super. 215 (1965)

211 A.2d 395

JAMES LAMENA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CAMDEN LOCAL NO. 396 OF THE JOURNEYMEN BARBERS, HAIRDRESSERS, COSMETOLOGISTS AND PROPRIETORS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 23, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Howard S. Simonoff argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Plone, Tomar, Parks & Seliger, attorneys).

Mr. Lee B. Laskin argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant union picketed plaintiff's barbershop in Haddonfield for the purpose of causing or coercing him to join the union and to induce his non-union employees to do so. The Chancery Division enjoined the picketing on the ground that there was no labor dispute and such picketing offended public policy.

We heard defendant's appeal and remanded the matter for further proofs and a determination as to whether the objective of the picketing offended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases