THOMPSON v. CINCINNATI.

No. 38919.

2 Ohio St. 2d 292 (1965)

THOMPSON, APPELLEE, v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLEE; CITY OF LOVELAND, APPELLANT, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 23, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Douglas & Carlier and Mr. Flach Douglas, for plaintiff-appellee.

Mr. William A. McClain, city solicitor, and Mr. William H. Brewe, for defendant-appellee city of Cincinnati.

Mr. Vernon Stiver, director of law, for appellant.

Messrs. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister and Mr. John W. Hudson, for Cincinnati Union Terminal Company.


HERBERT, J.

Although appellant, the city of Loveland, has discussed and alluded to numerous questions in its brief, the sole question presented by the record in its behalf is as follows: Can the city of Loveland levy an income tax on the wages of a resident, where such wages result from employment within another municipality and are subject to an income tax in that other municipality?

This court, through constitutional provisions and past decisions, is committed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases