1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 233 Cal.App.2d
  5. 233 Cal.App.2d 61 (1965)
 

BUFANO v. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. 21982.

233 Cal.App.2d 61 (1965)

43 Cal. Rptr. 223

BENIAMINO BUFANO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

March 17, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent Hallinan, Carl B. Shapiro, and Patrick Sarsfield Hallinan for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, and William E. Mullins, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.

TAYLOR, J.

On February 1, 1962, plaintiff filed this action against the City and County of San Francisco (hereafter referred to as City) for the conversion of two granite sculptures. The City alleged that his action was barred by the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 335, 338) as the conversion occurred in 1942 when the City acquired the sculptures. After a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, the trial court granted the City's motion for a judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases