1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 26 Wis.2d
  5. 26 Wis.2d 263 (1965)
 

KRCMAR v. REICHERT

26 Wis.2d 263 (1965)

KRCMAR, Respondent, v. REICHERT and others, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 5, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Clark & Kenyon of Tomah, and Hart, Kraege, Jackman & Wightman of Madison, and oral argument by F. Robert Kolacke of Madison.

For the respondent there was a brief by Curran & Curran of Mauston, and oral argument by Thomas J. Curran.

HEFFERNAN, J.

Defendants contend that Krcmar's causal negligence was, as a matter of law, equal to or greater than the causal negligence of Reichert. In their argument, they appear to claim that Reichert was free from negligence as well as that Krcmar's negligence was greater. Defendants also claim that it was error to receive in evidence a certain sketch.

". . . When a jury verdict is attacked we inquire only whether there is any credible evidence that under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases