1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 23 A.D.2d
  5. 23 A.D.2d 266 (1965)
 

CHESS, INC. v. CITY OF GLEN COVE

23 A.D.2d 266 (1965)

Mary Chess, Incorporated, et al., Appellants-Respondents, and Catco, Inc. et al., Respondents, v. City of Glen Cove et al., Respondents-Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 24, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reavis & McGrath (John P. McGrath, Reginald S. Hardy and Marland Gale of counsel), for appellants-respondents.

Huntington & Chase (Arden H. Rathkopf of counsel), for respondents.

George M. Aronwald and Junius P. Wilson, Jr., for respondents-appellants.

CHRIST and HILL, JJ., concur with BENJAMIN, J.; BELDOCK, P. J., dissents in part and votes to affirm the judgment in toto, in opinion in which RABIN, J., concurs.

BENJAMIN, J.

This is an action to declare unconstitutional an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Glen Cove in the County of Nassau, on the ground that such amendment is confiscatory as applied to plaintiffs' 19-acre tract of land known as Pratt Oval.

The six plaintiff corporations, Chess, Baymore, Cove, Ralsan, Universal and Nylacore, appeal from so much of a judgment as declared the amendment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases