SEYMOUR v. MAXWELL

No. 39265.

3 Ohio St. 2d 25 (1965)

SEYMOUR v. MAXWELL, WARDEN.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 30, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James Seymour, in propria persona.

Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, and Mr. William C. Baird, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Petitioner contends that his conviction is invalid because the court did not inform him of his statutory right to counsel (Sections 2941.50-52 inclusive, Revised Code) and he did not waive counsel.

To refute petitioner's contention respondent introduced into evidence an affidavit of the trial judge wherein he stated that he remembered the case, that petitioner had informed him that he understood the charge and wanted to plead guilty, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases