1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 28 Wis.2d
  5. 28 Wis.2d 249 (1965)
 

ZWEIFEL v. MILWAUKEE AUTOMOBILE MUT. INS. CO.

28 Wis.2d 249 (1965)

ZWEIFEL, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. MILWAUKEE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others, Defendants and Appellants: HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY and another, Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 5, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendants-appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Crosby H. Summers of Janesville.

For the plaintiffs-respondents there was a brief by Hall & Griffith of Madison, and oral argument by Laurence W. Hall.

For the defendants-respondents there was a brief by Geffs, Geffs, Block & Geffs of Janesville, and oral argument by Jacob Geffs.

WILKIE, J.

Three general questions are presented on this appeal. The first concerns the negligence of each driver and the jury's apportionment of the negligence as between Rowley (80 percent) and Propst (20 percent). The second involves the alleged improper closing arguments made by both respondents' counsel. The third pertains to whether or not there was prejudicial error committed during the trial on numerous points alleged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases