1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 241 Md.
  5. 241 Md. 36 (1965)
 

BALTO. MACHINE v. HOLTITE MANUFACTURING CO.

[No. 60, September Term, 1965.]

241 Md. 36 (1965)

215 A.2d 458

BALTIMORE MACHINE & EQUIPMENT, INC. v. HOLTITE MANUFACTURING CO., INC.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 20, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Enoch, with whom were Goodman, Meagher & Enoch on the brief, for appellant.

Donald N. Rothman and David H. Fishman, with whom were Gordon, Feinblatt & Rothman on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before PRESCOTT, C.J., and HAMMOND, HORNEY, OPPENHEIMER and McWILLIAMS, JJ.

HAMMOND, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Baltimore Machine and Equipment, Inc., a maker of tools and machinery, sued Holtite Manufacturing Co., Inc., a manufacturer of heels and soles for shoe repairers, on the common counts and a special count claiming that Holtite had refused to pay for a number of dowel pullers (which Holtite intended to supply to shoe repairers for use in pulling spiked heels from ladies' shoes) which Baltimore Machine had manufactured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases