1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 242 F.Supp.
  5. 242 F.Supp. 28 (1965)
 

RANSBURG ELECTRO-COATING CORP. v. PROCTOR ELECTRIC CO.

Civ. A. No. 10181.

242 F.Supp. 28 (1965)

RANSBURG ELECTRO-COATING CORPORATION v. PROCTOR ELECTRIC COMPANY, Inc. and Ionic Electrostatic Corporation.

United States District Court D. Maryland.

May 19, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. C. A. Anderson, Anderson, Coe & King, Baltimore, Md., James P. Hume, Howard W. Clement and Verne A. Trask, Indianapolis, Ind., Byron, Hume, Groen & Clement, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Lawrence A. Kaufman, Cable & McDaniel, Baltimore, Md., Edward F. Levy and Jesse Rothstein, Liberman & Levy, New York City, for defendants.

R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed a petition to have defendant Ionic Electrostatic Corporation (hereinafter "defendant"; Proctor is not herein involved) adjudicated to be in contempt of an order passed by this court on May 7, 1962, and for an awarding of damages, including actual damages, expenses and attorney's fees, for such alleged contempt. Subsequently the petition was amended to request trebling of actual damages for alleged willful and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases