1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 29 Wis.2d
  5. 29 Wis.2d 225 (1965)
 

JACKSON v. STATE

29 Wis.2d 225 (1965)

JACKSON, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 30, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by Wayne E. Rowlee of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by David E. Leichtfuss, first assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Hugh R. O'Connell, district attorney.

CURRIE, C. J.

The issues presented on this writ of error are:

(1) Were defendant's constitutional rights violated by the means used by the police officers to gain admission to arrest her?

(2) Was the arrest valid?

(3) Was there an illegal search and seizure?

(4) Was there sufficient credible evidence to prove defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?

Means Used to Gain Admission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases