1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 241 Md.
  5. 241 Md. 10 (1965)
 

HOUSTON v. LLOYD'S CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

[No. 13, September Term, 1965.]

241 Md. 10 (1965)

215 A.2d 192

HOUSTON, ET UX. v. LLOYD'S CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 17, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Rosenthal, with whom were Dorf, Pollack & Cahn on the brief, for appellants.

James A. Ostendorf, with whom was Harry M. Sachs, Jr., on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before PRESCOTT, C.J. and HAMMOND, HORNEY, OPPENHEIMER and McWILLIAMS, JJ.

McWILLIAMS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Availing themselves of the provisions of Maryland Rule 826 g1 the parties hereto signed and filed with the clerk of the lower court the following:

"Lloyd's Consumer Acceptance Corporation, Plaintiff, and Reed Houston and Catherine Houston, Defendants stipulate and agree under the provisions of Rule 826 g that the following is a statement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases