1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 28 Wis.2d
  5. 28 Wis.2d 205 (1965)
 

ZARTNER v. SCOPP

28 Wis.2d 205 (1965)

ZARTNER, Respondent, v. SCOPP and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 5, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Kivett & Kasdorf, attorneys, and Alan M. Clack of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Clack.

For the respondent there was a brief by Hippenmeyer & Reilly of Waukesha, and oral argument by William F. Reilly.

CURRIE, C. J.

The appellants-defendants contend that the causal negligence of plaintiff Zartner was as a matter of law at least equal to that of defendant Scopp, and, therefore, the judgment should be reversed and the complaint be dismissed. If the court decides this contention adversely to appellants, they then request a reversal and new trial on the following alleged grounds of prejudicial error:

(1) The jury's finding that Scopp's negligence was causal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases