McKENNA v. STATE HIGHWAY COMM.


28 Wis.2d 179 (1965)

MCKENNA and others, Appellants, v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 25, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Aberg, Bell, Blake & Metzner of Madison, and oral argument by George G. Blake.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Richard E. Barrett, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.


HEFFERNAN, J.

This appeal raises two issues:2

1. Does the complaint state a cause of action for damages caused by the commission's closing of Whitcomb Drive, which changed the petitioners' access from direct to circuitous?

2. Does the commission have authority pursuant to sec. 84.25 (3), Stats. (controlled-access highways) to close off accesses without compensation if the area is no longer rural?

We agree with the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases