1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 26 Wis.2d
  5. 26 Wis.2d 173 (1965)
 

CAHILL v. CAHILL

26 Wis.2d 173 (1965)

CAHILL, Appellant, v. CAHILL, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 5, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Nelson & Ehr of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Irving H. Nelson.

For the respondent there was a brief by Patrick T. Sheedy, attorney, and David F. Kopplin of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Sheedy.

BEILFUSS, J.

Was the trial court's finding that Mrs. Cahill did not wilfully desert her husband against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence?

The right to divorce must be predicated upon a violation of the marital relationship as recognized by the divorce statute. One of the grounds enumerated in the statute is wilful desertion.

Sec. 247.07 (3), Stats., provides a divorce may be granted, "For the wilful desertion of one party by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases