PORTERFIELD v. PORTERFIELD

No. 65-760.

181 So.2d 18 (1965)

Lillian PORTERFIELD, James W. Heistand and Malcolm L. Botsford, Appellants, v. C.B. PORTERFIELD, individually and for the Use and Benefit of Miami Metal, Inc., and Alloyed Metals, Inc., Miami Metal, Inc., and Alloyed Metals, Inc., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

December 7, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Guilmartin & Bartel, William W. Charles, Jepeway & Gassen, Joe N. Unger, Miami, for appellants.

Anderson & Nadeau, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, C.J., and CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.


CARROLL, Judge.

This appeal challenges appointment of a receiver. Our opinion and judgment filed this date on the appeal from the final decree (Appeal No. 65-440, 181 So.2d 16) and our order of September 9, 1965, entered in this appeal (No. 65-760), which stayed and in effect set aside the appointment of the receiver, appear determinative of the subject matter of this appeal, making ruling herein unnecessary.

It...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases