1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 86 N.J.
  5. 86 N.J. Super. 100 (1965)
 

PIAZZA v. PRINCE'S FARM

86 N.J. Super. 100 (1965)

206 A.2d 167

ANDRES V. PIAZZA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. PRINCE'S FARM, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 4, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Arthur F. Mead argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys).

Mr. Seymour B. Jacobs argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Balk & Jacobs, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, SULLIVAN and LABRECQUE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

This appeal involves the right to compensation of a resident employee who was continuously on call and was injured off the premises while returning from posting a letter. The Workmen's Compensation Division dismissed the claim petition on the ground that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of the employment. On appeal, the County Court reversed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases