CITY OF NEW YORK v. PANZIRER


23 A.D.2d 158 (1965)

City of New York, Respondent, v. Leo Panzirer, Respondent, and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Intervenor-Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 11, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph J. Ackell of counsel (Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, attorneys), for intervenor-appellant.

Jacob Friedes of counsel (Stanley Buchsbaum, Louis Pollack and Morris Sutton with him on the brief; Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

BOTEIN, P. J., RABIN, EAGER and STEUER, JJ., concur.


BREITEL, J.

The issue is whether a judgment creditor who has served a third-party information subpœna and restraining notice in judgment enforcement proceedings (but has not yet obtained a turnover order) is entitled to priority over a judgment creditor who subsequently procures a levy under an execution. The determination of the issue depends upon the applicability and effect of CPLR 5234 (subd. [c])....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases