1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 45 N.J.
  5. 45 N.J. 127 (1965)
 

SPRISSLER v. PENNSYLVANIA-READING S.S. LINES

45 N.J. 127 (1965)

211 A.2d 783

ALFRED SPRISSLER, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA-READING SEASHORE LINES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 28, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James M. Davis, Jr. argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Powell & Davis, attorneys).

Mr. Blaine E. Capehart argued the cause for respondent Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines (Messrs. Capehart & Scatchard, attorneys).

Mr. Alan B. Handler, First Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Highway Commissioner (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Avrom J. Gold, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The State Highway Commissioner, after conducting hearings, decided that the Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines should be permitted to discontinue its trains numbered 609 and 610 between Camden and Clementon and its trains numbered 754 and 775 between Camden and Millville. An appeal to the Appellate Division was taken from this decision by Alfred Sprissler and three unions, namely, the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases