CLEM v. BROWN

No. 19295

3 Ohio Misc. 167 (1965)

CLEM ET AL. v. BROWN.

Common Pleas Court of Paulding County.

Decided May 14, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Stroup & Walters and Mr. Harvey E. Hyman, for plaintiff.

Messrs. Drury & Ziegler, for defendant.


HITCHCOCK, J.

Defendant has filed a motion to strike the words from plaintiff wife's alleged second cause of action reading "she has lost his services and consortium."

As plaintiff husband is suing for his own loss of earnings and he is duty bound to support his wife insofar as he is able, the motion is sustained as to the words "services and".

The loss of consortium is, however, a different thing. There is no doubt that the law in Ohio has been that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases