ROSS v. ROSS


24 A.D.2d 125 (1965)

Nanette Ross, Respondent, v. Howard Ross, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 18, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney Rothenberg of counsel (Rothenberg & Atkins, attorneys), for appellant.

Joseph E. Brill of counsel (Robert E. Goldman with him on the brief; Brower Brill & Gangel, attorneys), for respondent.

BREITEL, J. P., VALENTE, EAGER and STALEY, JJ., concur; McNALLY, J., dissents and votes to affirm.


Per Curiam.

On the basis of conflicting and for the most part conclusory, unsubstantiated, affidavits submitted on a motion for temporary alimony in an action for separation, Special Term directed the husband to pay the wife $500 per week pendente lite. The order further awarded the wife exclusive possession of the marital home and directed additional support payments for school and Summer camp tuitions. No provision had been asked and none was made...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases