ROSS v. HASKINS, SUPT.,

No. 39209.

2 Ohio St. 2d 145 (1965)

ROSS v. HASKINS, SUPT., LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 5, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Dale O. Ross, in propria persona.

Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, and Mr. William C. Baird, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Petitioner bases his right to release on an alleged deprivation of his constitutional right to the assistance of counsel. Petitioner states that he was not offered counsel, was not told of his right to counsel and did not waive counsel.

The trial judge appeared as a witness at the hearing, and his testimony fully corroborates petitioner's contention.

The petitioner testified that he was not aware of his right to have counsel appointed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases