WATTENBURG v. WATTENBURG

No. 21239.

398 P.2d 977 (1965)

Jean M. WATTENBURG, Plaintiff in Error, v. James H. WATTENBURG, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.

February 8, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marks & Zelinger, Commerce City, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.


DAY, Justice.

Plaintiff in error has challenged the correctness of the trial court's order reducing child support payments below the amount ordered in the original decree of divorce. Defendant in error has not appeared and has filed no answer brief.

The order modifying the divorce decree finds no support either in the findings of the court or in the evidence. Actually the court did not find a change in circumstances warranting a reduction in child support...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases