WOLF v. BARKES

No. 434, Docket 29488.

348 F.2d 994 (1965)

Miriam J. WOLF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Curtis BARKES et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided June 21, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul L. Ross, New York City (Wolf, Popper, Ross, Wolf & Jones, Henry H. Wolf, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Peter P. Kenny, New York City (Bernard Buchwald, New York City), for appellees Kantor and Blair.

Arnold G. Fraiman, New York City (Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood, Edward N. Sherry, New York City, of counsel), for appellee Curtis Publishing Co.

David R. Hyde, New York City (Cahill, Gordon, Reindel & Ohl, New York City), for appellees Culligan and Mills.

Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.


FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:

Appellant's contention is that the pendency in a federal court of a stockholder's derivative action challenging arrangements between a corporation and its officers deprives the corporation and officers of power to make any out-of-court settlement — that is, one not requiring action by the court in the derivative suit — and that once the suit has been brought, there must be notice to stockholders and court approval as provided...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases