SCAIFE v. COLEMAN

No. 5-3505.

389 S.W.2d 884 (1965)

Mrs. Jane SCAIFE and Tom Dixon, Appellants, v. Otto COLEMAN and Ray Eisele, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

May 10, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. K. Grubbs, Sr., Eudora, for appellants.

No brief filed for appellee.


WARD, Justice.

The principal question for decision is whether appellees (Otto Coleman and Ray Eisele) have a right, acquired by prescription, of ingress and egress to and from their property over lands belonging to appellant (Mrs. Jane Scaife). Tom Dixon, a lessee, has no interest in this litigation and we will hereafter refer to Mrs. Scaife as appellant. A summary of the relevant and undisputed facts is set forth below.

Appellant owns (among other lands)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases