1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 29 Wis.2d
  5. 29 Wis.2d 95 (1965)
 

DRUML CO. v. CAPITOL MACHINERY S. & S. CO.

29 Wis.2d 95 (1965)

DRUML COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF and Respondent, v. CAPITOL MACHINERY SALES & SERVICE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant: E & C COMPANY, Intervening Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 30, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Glassner, Clancy & Glassner of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Lawrence Clancy.

For the respondent there was a brief by George E. Frederick, attorney, and William P. McGovern of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. McGovern.

HALLOWS, J.

The main issue is whether the trial court's finding that the screed was sold as a part of Lot 351 is contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. If the finding is not so contrary, this court will not upset it on appeal. Kirchen v. Gottschalk (1965), 26 Wis.2d 123, 131 N.W.2d 885; Estate of Rich (1965), 26 Wis.2d 86, 131 N.W.2d 909; Estate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases