1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 249 F.Supp.
  5. 249 F.Supp. 974 (1965)
 

STEWART-WARNER CORP. v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP.

Civ. No. 9254.

249 F.Supp. 974 (1965)

STEWART-WARNER CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Defendant, and Canadian Westinghouse Company Ltd., Intervenor-Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. New York.

February 16, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bean, Brooks, Buckley & Bean, Buffalo, N. Y., Augustus G. Douvas, Chicago, Ill. (Edwin T. Bean, Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Jaeckle, Fleischmann, Kelly, Swart & Augspurger, Buffalo, N. Y., Ralph H. Swingle, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Charles K. Rice, Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for defendants.

HENDERSON, District Judge.

On May 22, 1964, the intervenor, Canadian Westinghouse, filed a motion to amend its answer to include a claim that Reissue Patent 25,581, issued by the Patent Office on May 19, 1964, was infringed by the plaintiff, Stewart-Warner Corporation.

Claiming that Frans Brouwer, formerly an employee of Canadian Westinghouse and presently an employee of Stewart-Warner, is a co-grantee and a co-owner of the reissue patent and, therefore, an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases