1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 398 P.2d
  5. 398 P.2d 817 (1965)
 

NASH v. HILLER

No. 40661.

398 P.2d 817 (1965)

A. J. NASH, Plaintiff in Error, v. William H. HILLER and Earl Butler, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

February 2, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack B. Sellers, Sapulpa, for plaintiff in error. Joe A. Moore, Sapulpa, of counsel on the brief.

Joseph M. Best, Joseph A. Sharp, Tulsa, for defendant in error Earl Butler.

WILLIAMS, Justice.

The question to be determined in this appeal is whether certain testimony of a highway patrolman who investigated the collision here involved was admissible in evidence.

This is the second appeal of this case. Our opinion in the first appeal appears in 380 P.2d 77. In our present opinion we will not detail the facts for the reason they are stated fully in our first opinion.

Plaintiff in error initiated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases