1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 27 Wis.2d
  5. 27 Wis.2d 92 (1965)
 

SPARKMAN v. STATE

27 Wis.2d 92 (1965)

SPARKMAN, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 2, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by Lloyd A. Barbee of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown and William A. Platz, assistant attorneys general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

HALLOWS, J.

The defendant makes three claims for reversal: (1) He was constitutionally entitled as an indigent to appointed counsel at his preliminary hearing; (2) he appeared manacled or handcuffed at the preliminary hearing and subsequently three times before the trial court; and (3) there is not sufficient credible evidence to sustain the verdict of guilty. We will consider these alleged grounds for reversal in reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases