CLAY, Commissioner.
In this condemnation case the Commonwealth raises the single question of whether the court improperly excluded the testimony of one of the Commonwealth's witnesses relating to a comparable sale.
We will assume, without deciding, that the excluded testimony was competent and should have been admitted. The ruling of the court on this question could not have been prejudicial.
The purpose of this evidence was to justify the witness...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.