1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 345 F.2d
  5. 345 F.2d 838 (1965)
 

PRATT AND WHITNEY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES

Nos. 81-57, 82-57, 458-57, 459-57, 5-59, 6-59, 7-61, 113-61.

345 F.2d 838 (1965)

PRATT AND WHITNEY COMPANY, Inc., Ferdinando Carlo Reggio, and Chandler-Evans Corp. v. The UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

May 14, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy E. Petherbridge, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs; Petherbridge, O'Neill & Aubel, Chicago, Ill., Robert F. Conrad, Washington, D.C., William E. Dampier, William H. Davis, George E. Faithful, Joseph D. Lazar, Harvey M. Brownrout, New York City, and Augustin M. Prentiss, West Hartford, Conn., of counsel.

E. R. Weisbender, Washington, D. C., with whom was John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant; William D. Hall, Elliott I. Pollock, and Thomas J. Byrnes, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Before COWEN, Chief Judge, and LARAMORE, DURFEE, DAVIS and COLLINS, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This patent case comes before the court on the merits on defendant's motion pursuant to Rules 62 and 66 that the court adopt the opinion, findings of fact and recommended conclusions of law filed by Trial Commissioner Donald E. Lane on April 23, 1964. On March 2, 1965, plaintiffs filed a notice, signed by the atsorneys for defendant, agreeing to file no exceptions or brief and present no oral argument with respect...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases