1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 28 Wis.2d
  5. 28 Wis.2d 89 (1965)
 

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

28 Wis.2d 89 (1965)

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and another, Appellants, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 25, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Kracht & Zauner of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Edward J. Kracht.

For the respondent Industrial Commission the cause was argued by Gordon Samuelsen, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the respondent Margaret Spinnler Hilty there was a brief by Levy & Levy of Cedarburg, and oral argument by Lowell K. Levy.

FAIRCHILD, J.

The challenged specific findings. The commission found that Hilty had been employed by Justro "for about three years." Appellants correctly point out that Hilty's employment by Justro had begun four months before his death. This error is immaterial.

The commission found that the dogs had been "taken over" from Ready and belonged to Justro. It appears, as asserted by appellants, that Ready retained ownership of the dogs until they were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases