1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 237 F.Supp.
  5. 237 F.Supp. 871 (1965)
 

RUDNICK v. FRANCHARD CORPORATION

237 F.Supp. 871 (1965)

Arthur RUDNICK et al., Plaintiffs, v. FRANCHARD CORPORATION et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

January 29, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley L. Siegel, New York City, for plaintiffs; Malchman & Klied, New York City, Irving Malchman, New York City, of counsel.

Kramer, Bandler & Labaton, New York City, for defendant Morris Cohon & Co., Sidney Kramer and Edward Labaton, New York City, of counsel.

METZNER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek relief for alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. One of the defendants, Morris Cohon & Co. (Cohon), moves for summary judgment pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 56.

This case has been assigned to me for all purposes pursuant to rule 2 of the General Rules of this court. It is to be tried to the court without a jury.

This is a spurious class action (F.R. Civ.P. 23...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases