1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 238 Cal.App.2d
  5. 238 Cal.App.2d 859 (1965)
 

ATCHISON, T. & S.F. RY. CO. v. HILDEBRAND

Docket No. 27764.

238 Cal.App.2d 859 (1965)

48 Cal. Rptr. 339

THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CLIFTON HILDEBRAND et al., Defendants and Appellants. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CLIFTON HILDEBRAND et al., Defendants and Appellants. (Consolidated Cases.)

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

December 20, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sea & Hanna, Donald M. Sea, Hildebrand & McLeod, Bodle & Fogel and George E. Bodle, for Defendants and Appellants.

Belcher, Henzie & Biegenzahn, Frank B. Belcher and Leo J. Biegenzahn for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

ROTH, P.J.

This appeal is by defendants Hildebrand, Bills, McLeod, Daggett, Dragmire, Bockhold and the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen (appellants) from a consent judgment for a permanent injunction rendered and entered in favor of plaintiffs The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company and Southern Pacific Company, respondents herein.

Respondents' amended complaints (the originals were filed July 23, 1959) allege that appellants Hildebrand, Bills...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases