1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 26 Wis.2d
  5. 26 Wis.2d 80 (1965)
 

LEMKE v. GUSE

26 Wis.2d 80 (1965)

LEMKE, Respondent, v. GUSE and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 5, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by John H. Regan of Milwaukee, attorney, and James A. Fitzpatrick of Watertown of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Fitzpatrick.

For the respondent there was a brief by Habush, Gillick & Habush, attorneys, and Robert L. Habush of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Robert L. Habush.

FAIRCHILD, J.

Defendants contend (1) there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that Miss Guse was negligent, and (2) if she was negligent, the evidence would not support a verdict attributing 65 percent of the causal negligence to her.

"When a jury verdict is attacked we inquire only whether there is any credible evidence that, under any reasonable view, supports the verdict."1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases