1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 144 S.E.2d
  5. 144 S.E.2d 902 (1965)
 

TINDAL v. MILLS

No. 544.

144 S.E.2d 902 (1965)

265 N.C. 716

E. B. TINDAL, Jr., t/a Apex Oil Company v. O. J. MILLS.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 24, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Holleman & Savage, Apex, for plaintiff.

Seawell & Harrell, Raleigh, for defendant.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant makes twenty-one assignments of error and brings forward and discusses eleven of these in his brief. It is noted that none of the assignments relied on, except that relating to nonsuit, complies with Rules 19(3) and 21 of the rules of practice in the Supreme Court. 254 N.C. 797, 803. See Brown v. Brown, 264 N.C. 485, 141 S.E.2d 875. However, we have carefully examined and considered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases